<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>loans &#8211; The Energy Chronicle</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/tag/loans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu</link>
	<description>Energy News from FSEC®, Florida&#039;s Premier Energy Research Center, at the University of Central Florida</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Retrofit Florida: Create Jobs and Save Money on Electricity</title>
		<link>https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/2010/04/retrofit-florida/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/2010/04/retrofit-florida/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sherri Shields]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Director's Message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrofit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/?p=657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Retrofit Florida: Create Jobs and Save Money on Electricity from Florida Solar Energy Center on Vimeo. What will happen to Florida if we do not pass an Energy Policy this year? What will be the cost of our monthly electric]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="450" height="337" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=10954395&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00ADEF&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450" height="337" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=10954395&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=0&amp;show_byline=0&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00ADEF&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/10954395">Retrofit Florida: Create Jobs and Save Money on Electricity</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user470671">Florida Solar Energy Center</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-657"></span></p>
<p>What will happen to Florida if we do not pass an Energy Policy this year? What will be the cost of our monthly electric bills if we do nothing?  Will we save money and create jobs if we do nothing?</p>
<p>Can we invest in our Energy Future without raising taxes?  Let’s look to our homes to create New Clean Green Jobs for Florida so we can create economic growth, which increases the state&#8217;s revenues.  Let’s renovate our homes cost-effectively, thereby saving money on our monthly electric bills.  Let’s not ship money out of state for purchase of coal and natural gas to make electricity. Let’s put people to work and use some of the energy savings to put solar energy on our roofs.</p>
<p>Fifty-one percent of the  electricity that utilities produce are used in   our residences, “we the  citizens” consume electricity so, “we” need to   use energy efficiently.</p>
<figure id="attachment_698" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-698" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/51-percent.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-698" title="51 percent" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/51-percent-300x225.png" alt="Fifty-one percent of Florida's electricity is used in homes." width="300" height="225" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-698" class="wp-caption-text">Fifty-one percent of Florida&#39;s electricity is used in homes.</figcaption></figure>
<p>This plot shows the average annual household electricity use in MWh/yr  historically, along with the October 2009 Florida Public Service  Commission 10-Year Forecast.</p>
<figure id="attachment_663" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-663" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide12.gif"><img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-663" title="slide1" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide12-300x218.gif" alt="2009 Florida Public Service Commission's 10-Year Site Plan" width="300" height="218" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-663" class="wp-caption-text">2009 Florida Public Service Commission&#39;s 10-Year Site Plan</figcaption></figure>
<p>The actual energy use per household showed an increase from 1993  until the peak electricity use per household of 2003 (14.6 MWh/yr).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<figure id="attachment_699" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-699" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/energy-increase-from-1993-to-peak.png"><img decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-699 " title="energy increase from 1993 to peak" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/energy-increase-from-1993-to-peak-300x225.png" alt="Peak energy increase" width="300" height="225" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-699" class="wp-caption-text">Electricity use per household peaked in 2003.</figcaption></figure>
<p>The 2009 forecast, predicted in 2008, shows a decrease of 2.1% in average annual household electricity use over the ten year forecast.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<figure id="attachment_701" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-701" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/21-percent-decrease1.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-701  " title="21 percent decrease" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/21-percent-decrease1-300x225.png" alt="placeholder" width="300" height="225" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-701" class="wp-caption-text">The 2009 Public Service Commission forecast of electricity over 10-years.</figcaption></figure>
<p>Clearly, if “we” use less electricity, it is good for the environment and it requires Florida to import less fossil fuels like natural gas and coal into Florida, but does it mean “we” pay less per month for electricity?</p>
<p><strong>No, we will pay more and this plot shows why.</strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_666" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-666" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide2.gif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-666" title="slide2" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide2-300x189.gif" alt="Projected Electric Costs" width="300" height="189" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-666" class="wp-caption-text">Projected Electric Costs</figcaption></figure>
<p>This plot of the average monthly household electricity cost over time shows the historical costs and the 10-year forecasted costs. The 2009 forecast shows a decrease in electricity consumption of 2.1% over the ten-year period of 2009 to 2018, but electricity cost is increasing at 4.7% per year, so the electric cost of ~$148 per month of today turns into $210 per month by 2018.</p>
<p>This means that the cost of having no new energy policy and doing business as usual will cost the citizens of Florida at least $62 per month in 2018, there will be no new job creation and we will continue to purchase more fossil fuels and export our money out of the state.</p>
<p>Does it have to be this way? No, we must pass an Energy Policy that  provides incentives and loans to retrofit our homes to make them more  energy efficient.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<figure id="attachment_713" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-713" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/energy-policy-arrows.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-713" title="energy-policy-arrows" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/energy-policy-arrows-300x225.png" alt="An energy policy that incorporates incentives and loans to retrofit homes is essential to create jobs and save money." width="300" height="225" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-713" class="wp-caption-text">An energy policy that incorporates incentives and loans to retrofit homes is essential to create jobs and save money.</figcaption></figure>
<p>We can actually pay less for electricity each month than we do now, and use the savings to purchase the efficiency improvements and provide rebates for putting solar energy on our roofs.</p>
<figure id="attachment_668" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-668" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide3.gif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-668" title="slide3" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide3-300x190.gif" alt="Deep Retrofit Potential" width="300" height="190" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-668" class="wp-caption-text">Deep Retrofit Potential</figcaption></figure>
<p>If  we cost effectively retrofit our homes with eight energy efficiency measures and solar hot water heating, instead of paying $82 more each month in 2020, we will save $46 each month over today’s cost.  The cost of doing nothing compared to the cost of an energy policy that encourages energy efficiency and solar energy on your rooftop is more than $128 month or $1,536 per year, per household.</p>
<figure id="attachment_669" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-669" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide4.gif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-669 " title="slide4" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/slide4-300x188.gif" alt="Potential for Cost-Effective Deep Retrofits compared to Business As Usual (BAU)" width="300" height="188" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-669" class="wp-caption-text">Potential for Cost-Effective Deep Retrofits Compared to Business As Usual (BAU)</figcaption></figure>
<p>The eight energy efficiency measures and solar water heating provides energy savings of 56% ($128 per month per household).</p>
<p>The savings measure in the order of most economical (lowest cost to benefit ratio) are:</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="4" width="600" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th style="font-size:12px;" scope="col">Key</th>
<th style="font-size:12px;" scope="col">Efficiency Measure</th>
<th style="font-size:12px;" scope="col">Specification</th>
<th style="font-size:12px;" scope="col">Cost to Benefit Ratio</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#082462"></td>
<td valign="top">Programmable Thermostat</td>
<td valign="top">2 degrees set up/back</td>
<td valign="top">0.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#b6cc93"></td>
<td valign="top">Attic Duct Leakage</td>
<td valign="top">10% → 3%</td>
<td valign="top">0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#3333cc"></td>
<td valign="top">Fluorescent Lighting</td>
<td valign="top">10% → 75%</td>
<td valign="top">0.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#ffcc00"></td>
<td valign="top">Upgrade Ceiling Insulation</td>
<td valign="top">R18 → R38</td>
<td valign="top">0.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#9966ff"></td>
<td valign="top">Windows</td>
<td valign="top">U-0.75 → 0.39 /SHGC-0.65 → 0.28</td>
<td valign="top">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#ff9999"></td>
<td valign="top">Refrigerator Replacement</td>
<td valign="top">ENERGYSTAR</td>
<td valign="top">0.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#33cc33"></td>
<td valign="top">Exterior Block Wall Insulation</td>
<td valign="top">R-1 → R-10</td>
<td valign="top">0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#ffcc99"></td>
<td valign="top">Air Conditioner</td>
<td valign="top">SEER 9.25 → SEER 17 to 21</td>
<td valign="top">0.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" bgcolor="#ccccff"></td>
<td valign="top">Solar Hot Water</td>
<td valign="top">40 ft2, 80 gallon, PV-pumped</td>
<td valign="top">0.97</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>We can do something.</strong> We should chose to retrofit our homes cost-effectively to make them more energy efficient.  We will then pay less for electricity each month than we do now and use the savings to purchase the efficiency improvements and provide rebates for putting solar energy on our roofs.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<figure id="attachment_711" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-711" style="width: 300px" class="wp-caption aligncenter"><a href="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/rerofitting-chart1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-711" title="rerofitting-chart" src="https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/rerofitting-chart1-300x225.jpg" alt="Retrofitting Florida Homes Creates Jobs and Saves Money" width="300" height="225" /></a><figcaption id="caption-attachment-711" class="wp-caption-text">Retrofitting Florida Homes Creates Jobs and Saves Money on Electricity</figcaption></figure>
<p>Retrofitting 3% of the homes per year will generate $1,536 in energy savings per home — a total of $285 million in total cost savings for the 186,000 retrofitted homes, while saving 1.05 million tons of CO2.  Each year we will generate $3.8 billion in new economic activity, 42,026 direct jobs and 15,282 indirect jobs.</p>
<p><strong>If Florida invests in our homes, people go back to work, property values increase, and we save money every month!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.energyresearch.ucf.edu/2010/04/retrofit-florida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
